When director Bo Arne Vibenius set out to make the most
commercial movie ever, little did he suspect what impact 1974’s
Thriller: A Cruel Picture (one of its
many titles) would have on future cinema.
If this movie hadn’t of been made, we would have never had Elle Driver
in
Kill Bill. That role was directly inspired by Vibenius’
Frigga character, played by the amazing
Christina Lindberg, whose first
centerfold spread in a men’s magazine (
Lektyr)
happened while she was still in high school.
This movie that inspired Tarantino may not be the most commercial movie
ever made, but it sure raised a few eyebrows.
Frigga is a young woman who was left mute by a sexual
assault in her youth. One day she
accepts a ride from a stranger and quickly finds herself forcibly addicted to
heroin and pushed into prostitution.
When she angers the man who did this to her, she gets her eye taken out
to teach her a lesson. Not one to just
take her lot in life lying down, Frigga uses her money to buy weapons and take
martial arts classes in order to extract her revenge on all who have wronged
her. (Kind of like a low rent
The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo.) Prime
exploitation stuff.
As if the subject matter weren’t controversial enough, the eye
removal scene was actually filmed with the cadaver of a young female who had
recently committed suicide. The film
also had hardcore sex scenes added to it to help boost revenue.
Those who have watched a lot of exploitation will tell you
that this Swedish film isn’t actually all that rough and tumble, and they are
correct. It would shock the hell out of
the average moviegoer used to Julia Roberts and superheroes, but all things
considered, it really isn’t as nasty as it sounds. In fact, at times it almost seems like a
made-for-television movie. So why do I
have it on the list?
Thriller has a
certain quality to it that you can’t quite put your finger on. It’s definitely a product of the early ‘70s,
and it feels like a foreign film trying to be American. Vibenius, who directed and wrote the film
under a pseudonym, tried something fairly gutsy and stylized, and had very
little money with which to do it. What
he created wasn’t exactly what he was trying for, I’m sure, but it was
something magical. No one who has ever
seen the film has ever forgotten it … no matter what title they saw it
under. (My favorite being
Hooker’s Revenge.) It’s that kind of courage that’s missing from
a lot of cinema. Sure, filmmakers have
grand ideas, but how many have ever said they were going to make the most
commercial movie ever created and then threw in a mutilated corpse, rape, drug
addiction, copious amounts of nudity and blood, and hardcore sex scenes? Bingo.
No director in his or her right mind would attempt such a thing … and
then try to make it artistic! The
audacity of Vibenius is amazing. I can
only find that he has written and directed three films in his short career, but
this one is actually more than enough.
Only in the ‘70s…
Mandatory FTC Disclaimer: I did not receive this film for review. Clicking on it may earn me a commission.
No comments:
Post a Comment