You would think that a movie that bills itself as the "laugh riot of the century" and features "daring nudes on the loose" while filmed in "Nudiscope" would be one incredible piece of 1960s-era cinema.
You would be horribly wrong.
While working on my upcoming film review book, I came across this gem, and had to watch it. It was only about 55 minutes. How bad could it be?
Automobile accident bad. I could not look away from the wreck. No onscreen dialogue. A narrator who seemed to be making things up on the fly. A plot that made little sense. What it did have was plenty of female nudity. Why? Because it was the only way people would see this thing.
The nudity starts at a burlesque show in a scene that goes on for far too long. From there we are introduced to a nudist colony of three that has taken up residence in a strange hotel and a camera that takes pictures of people in the raw (unless they are already nude -- then it somehow puts clothes on them). The possession of that camera is the film's driving factor.
I'm all for female nudity. The female form is nature at its finest. To put it in such a film, however, does a total disservice to women everywhere. The one good thing I can say about the movie is that the women featured are real looking women with curves. Compare that to the nudity in films today, and you can see what a difference fifty years makes.
Mandatory FTC Disclaimer: I did not get this film for free. Thank the Gods.
It Has Happened
-
I've done it. I've sinned. Joined the ranks of the zombies. Not only did I
download Tik Tok, but now I've also posted my first video. It's a
self-promot...
11 months ago
No comments:
Post a Comment