I recently watched Bug, and based on the talent involved I was really expecting something much better. William Friedkin directed it. Ashley Judd and Harry Connick, Jr. star in it. Those aren't bad names to have attached to a project. So why I did I think this failed so badly?
I have two opinions when it comes to that. First, and this irritated me to no end, it was promoted as a horror movie, and it is anything but that. It does have horrific elements to it, but it is a primarily a movie about paranoia and mental illness. Yes, these can be elements in a horror movie, but here they aren't handled that way. That was annoying, but it didn't sink the picture. I put little stock in how a movie is promoted, other than to say when it is promoted like this one the studio obviously doesn't know how to handle it.
What really annoyed me is that by the end of the film I had to ask myself what was the point behind it. It seemed like a lot of nothing to get to nowhere. The end left me shrugging and wondering what else I could've done with my time.
If you read the comments and reviews on IMDB, you'd get the idea that this film is "not for the faint of heart." I'm pretty sure the only people who would find this disturbing are those whose only viewing material prior to this film was QVC. There is nothing truly bothersome in it, and while one character does do some self-dentistry, it is nothing that hasn't been seen before ... and better.
Bug ends up being a wonderful premise done very poorly. If lesser-knowns were attached to it, I think it actually may have been better as more risks would've been taken. Instead, it is a project that has "movie of the week" written all over it.
Mandatory FTC Disclaimer: The studio did not send me this film, but a co-worker did lend it to me.
It Has Happened
-
I've done it. I've sinned. Joined the ranks of the zombies. Not only did I
download Tik Tok, but now I've also posted my first video. It's a
self-promot...
11 months ago
No comments:
Post a Comment